Gallery of Fashion

Costume plates and many dozen artists who recorded the fashion scene throughout the 17th and 18th centuries, were the forerunners of the glossy fashion magazines and fashion photographs of today.

Early costume plates were produced solely for the purpose of recording national and regional dress and it was not until the 17th century that costume drawing was taken seriously.

The ‘Father of costume plates’ might be said to be Wenceeslas Holler, a Polish engraver, discovered and brought to England by the Earl of Arundel in 1640.

Holler was an incomparable draughtsman and engraver and his first series of plates was an immediate success.

In 1788, two enterprising young Parisian printsellers, Jacques Esnauts and Michel Rapilly hit upon the great idea of issuing costume plates regularly and in colour calling their publication, ‘La Gallerie des Modes’.

It was not, however, devoted solely to fashion.

Although the young authors broke fresh ground by describing the clothes depicted careful(and, on occasion,wickedly amusing) detail, they included illustrations of well known people at Court, in fancy costumes.

Four different artists drew ‘La Gallerie des Modes’ and, of these, Claude-Louis Desrais produced the most charming.

His work, which had movement and considerable Gallic humour, is much sought after by collectors.

BY 1785 a marked difference in male fashion for country and dress wear had evolved. Generally the cut was term and boyish, a narrow frock coat cut away o reveal the legs and upper thighs. tripped fabrics were very popular for men, accentuating the lean look, the stripes either woven into material or embroidered. Wings were full, frequently unpowdered, the queue, or pigtail, turned up at the back and tied with a black ribbon. Hats were cocked in a variety of ways: cocked both back and front, as this fashion late by Desrais, was termed ‘bicorne’.

When the publication ceased in 1794, there was a gap in the production of really good costume plates for several years until 1794, when a German born engraver, Wilhelm von Heideloff, living in London, began publishing ‘The Galery of Fashion’.

The illustrations were still costume plates and not yet fashion plates. ‘The Gallery of Fashion’ was published in monthly parts, each consisting of two aquatints beautifully coloured by hand and enriched with gold and silver leaf.

In 1794, waists on dresses were high and rounded and bodice fronts were fastened edge to edge. The skirts were sometimes left open down the front, revealing full, gathered muslin petticoats. Long scarfs of muslin or velvet were worn down i around the shoulders and crossed over the bosom to fall down in front, and were secured by a waist ribbon. Lady’s underwear at this time consisted of a chemise, soft full petticoats, a short corset, white stockings or, sometimes, fresh coloured tights.

(Subscribers to the issue included several of the royal family but Her Gracious Majesty, Queen Charlotte, withheld her royal enthusiasm until a later issue).

It is said that Deais’ draughtsmanshi is unquestionably superior to that of Heidelloff.

Although women’s dress had become far more relaxed in shape for day war, court dresses and ball gowns were still wide skirted and hooped and strips were still fashionable. The hats of this season did not follow a basic fashion trend, apparently. Low-crowned and brimmed straws, mob caps trimmed wit with fur and fantastically trimmed turbans were all made at the same time. Fur appeared on several of the dresses and tippets and muffs were popular, sometimes dyed to match the gown.

However, in its , ‘The Galley of Fashion’ faithfully recorded not only the apparel being worn by ladies of quality but also their occupations.

Some of the finer examples of Heideloff’s work show his figures engaged in ladylike pursuits such as driving in Berlin, reading in Kenisgton Gardens, singing and playing at the harpsichord, strolling by the sea and a wealth of accessory detail; fans, bonnets,books, parasols, trinkets-and dogs.

The Parsian ‘La Gallerie des Modes’ sometimes captioned its fashion plates adversely, delighting readers with witty and malicious observations on the unattractive fashion of the day. Although hats were in fact very large and sometimes astonishingly trimmed with fruit, flowers, feathers and ribbons, it is likely that this drawing, by Desrais, is an exaggeration of the current mode. Sometimes, personalities at Court were illustrated in fancy costume-the captions to these were rarely complimentary-but always amusing.

Who can say whether modern fashion magazines will give as much visual and aesthetic pleasure one hundred years from now!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s